The Next Person to Say "Cut and Run" gets Cut and Runover by My Car
As more public pressure mounts for an Iraq exit plan, and as Democrats more boldly call for withdrawal dates, the Republicans respond the same way they do to everything.
With rhetoric. Repetitive oversimplifications. Catchphrases.
Which leads me to "cut and run." A catchphrase assigned to any call for an exit strategy. Any exit strategy. At any time. It is meant to give the impression that if we leave, we are abandoning the Iraqis or the mission or the oil (oops, I mean the "democracy"). It is meant to convey that anyone who suggests ending the Iraq War at any time is suggesting that we lose.
And the Republican parrots are out in droves, spewing this catchphrase all over the papers and the television. So much so that Dana Milbanks wrote an entire piece on the phrase and its use in the past two days. So much so that the banner at the bottom of Hardball last night read "Cut and Run or Stay the Course?". [I'll ignore for the moment the obvious prejudice of that banner.]
If Americans could only think beyond the hype, they might think something like this:
But Americans do not generally think past the rhetoric. So instead of analyzing information and forming lucid arguments (like the liberal elite that they are), Democrats should spend all their time working to get Hardball's banner to say
"Give Iraq back to Iraqis or Stay Forever?"
With rhetoric. Repetitive oversimplifications. Catchphrases.
Which leads me to "cut and run." A catchphrase assigned to any call for an exit strategy. Any exit strategy. At any time. It is meant to give the impression that if we leave, we are abandoning the Iraqis or the mission or the oil (oops, I mean the "democracy"). It is meant to convey that anyone who suggests ending the Iraq War at any time is suggesting that we lose.
And the Republican parrots are out in droves, spewing this catchphrase all over the papers and the television. So much so that Dana Milbanks wrote an entire piece on the phrase and its use in the past two days. So much so that the banner at the bottom of Hardball last night read "Cut and Run or Stay the Course?". [I'll ignore for the moment the obvious prejudice of that banner.]
If Americans could only think beyond the hype, they might think something like this:
On a basic level:
The Republicans say, "if we leave, the terrorists win." But don't troops leave a country when the war is over? If we win the war (which they say we have), and we withdraw troops, does this still cause the terrorists to win? Does that mean we did not win? And if leaving means surrender, how are we not occupiers?
Or on a more complex level:
The Republicans say, "as the Iraqis stand up, we stand down." On the political front, the Iraqis "standing up" means forming a sovereign, elected government. Which they have.
That leaves the military front. The Iraqis are "standing up" at a rate of 4,700 new troops per month, so U.S. soldiers should "stand down" at a rate of 4,700 troops per month. There are 155,000 troops on the ground, so at a rate of 4,700 per month, the last troops should leave within 33 months (just under 3 years from now).
That sounds like a timetable to me, which is clearly "cutting and running".
So either the administration's plan is also "cut and run," or it is "as Iraqis stand up, we will stand up too, with bigger guns." Or, as Harry Reid put it, "I guess their position is 'we're there forever.'"
But Americans do not generally think past the rhetoric. So instead of analyzing information and forming lucid arguments (like the liberal elite that they are), Democrats should spend all their time working to get Hardball's banner to say
"Give Iraq back to Iraqis or Stay Forever?"
posted by Jezebella at 3:35 PM
1 Comments:
The plan I am sending you has been approved by many prominent thinkers and
activists in the field. Which includes: Benjamin Ferencz, Chief Prosecutor
at the Nuremburg Trials, Ken Livingstone-Mayor of London,
Bishop Thomas Gumbleton of Detroit, Tom Hayden, Matthew Rothschild, Anthony Arnove, Danny Schecter, Tony Benn- Former Member of the British parliament ,Reggie Rivers,
Robert Jensen, Andrew Bard Schmookler and others.
I formulated this plan in September 2004, based on a comprehensive
study of the issues. For my plan to be successful it must be implemented
with all seven points beginning to happen within a very short period of
time.
I have run up against a wall of doubt about my plan due to it's
rational nature ,and due to it's adherence to placing the blame on the
invaders, and then trying to formulate a process of extrication which would
put all entities in this conflict face to face, to begin to finally solve
the dilemmas that exist.
If you read my plan you will see that it is guided by a reasonable
and practical compromise that could end this war and alleviate the
internecine civil violence that is confronting Iraq at this juncture in it's
history.
I am making a plea for my plan to be put into action on a wide-scale.
I need you to circulate it and use all the persuasion you have to bring it
to the attention of those in power.
Just reading my plan and sending off an e-mail to me that you received
it will not be enough.
This war must end-we who oppose it can do this by using my plan.
We must fight the power and end the killing.
If you would like to view some comments and criticism about my plan
I direct you to my blog: sevenpointman
Thank you my dear friend,
Howard Roberts
A Seven-point plan for an Exit Strategy in Iraq
1) A timetable for the complete withdrawal of American and British forces
must be announced.
I envision the following procedure, but suitable fine-tuning can be
applied by all the people involved.
A) A ceasefire should be offered by the Occupying side to
representatives of both the Sunni insurgency and the Shiite community. These
representatives would be guaranteed safe passage, to any meetings. The
individual insurgency groups would designate who would attend.
At this meeting a written document declaring a one-month ceasefire,
witnessed by a United Nations authority, will be fashioned and eventually
signed. This document will be released in full, to all Iraqi newspapers, the
foreign press, and the Internet.
B) US and British command will make public its withdrawal, within
sixth-months of 80 % of their troops.
C) Every month, a team of United Nations observers will verify the
effectiveness of the ceasefire.
All incidences on both sides will be reported.
D) Combined representative armed forces of both the Occupying
nations and the insurgency organizations that agreed to the cease fire will
protect the Iraqi people from actions by terrorist cells.
E) Combined representative armed forces from both the Occupying
nations and the insurgency organizations will begin creating a new military
and police force. Those who served, without extenuating circumstances, in
the previous Iraqi military or police, will be given the first option to
serve.
F) After the second month of the ceasefire, and thereafter, in
increments of 10-20% ,a total of 80% will be withdrawn, to enclaves in Qatar
and Bahrain. The governments of these countries will work out a temporary
land-lease housing arrangement for these troops. During the time the troops
will be in these countries they will not stand down, and can be re-activated
in the theater, if the chain of the command still in Iraq, the newly
formed Iraqi military, the leaders of the insurgency, and two international
ombudsman (one from the Arab League, one from the United Nations), as a
majority, deem it necessary.
G) One-half of those troops in enclaves will leave three-months after they
arrive, for the United States or other locations, not including Iraq.
H) The other half of the troops in enclaves will leave after
six-months.
I) The remaining 20 % of the Occupying troops will, during this six
month interval, be used as peace-keepers, and will work with all the
designated organizations, to aid in reconstruction and nation-building.
J) After four months they will be moved to enclaves in the above
mentioned countries.
They will remain, still active, for two month, until their return to
the States, Britain and the other involved nations.
2) At the beginning of this period the United States will file a letter with
the Secretary General of the Security Council of the United Nations, making
null and void all written and proscribed orders by the CPA, under R. Paul
Bremer. This will be announced and duly noted.
3) At the beginning of this period all contracts signed by foreign countries
will be considered in abeyance until a system of fair bidding, by both
Iraqi and foreign countries, will be implemented ,by an interim Productivity
and Investment Board, chosen from pertinent sectors of the Iraqi economy.
Local representatives of the 18 provinces of Iraq will put this board
together, in local elections.
4) At the beginning of this period, the United Nations will declare that
Iraq is a sovereign state again, and will be forming a Union of 18
autonomous regions. Each region will, with the help of international
experts, and local bureaucrats, do a census as a first step toward the
creation of a municipal government for all 18 provinces. After the census, a
voting roll will be completed. Any group that gets a list of 15% of the
names on this census will be able to nominate a slate of representatives.
When all the parties have chosen their slates, a period of one-month will be
allowed for campaigning.
Then in a popular election the group with the most votes will represent that
province.
When the voters choose a slate, they will also be asked to choose five
individual members of any of the slates.
The individuals who have the five highest vote counts will represent a
National government.
This whole process, in every province, will be watched by international
observers as well as the local bureaucrats.
During this process of local elections, a central governing board, made up
of United Nations, election governing experts, insurgency organizations, US
and British peacekeepers, and Arab league representatives, will assume the
temporary duties of administering Baghdad, and the central duties of
governing.
When the ninety representatives are elected they will assume the legislative
duties of Iraq for two years.
Within three months the parties that have at least 15% of the
representatives will nominate candidates for President and Prime Minister.
A national wide election for these offices will be held within three months
from their nomination.
The President and the Vice President and the Prime Minister will choose
their cabinet, after the election.
5) All debts accrued by Iraq will be rescheduled to begin payment, on the
principal after one year, and on the interest after two years. If Iraq is
able to handle another loan during this period she should be given a grace
period of two years, from the taking of the loan, to comply with any
structural adjustments.
6) The United States and the United Kingdom shall pay Iraq reparations for
its invasion in the total of 120 billion dollars over a period of twenty
years for damages to its infrastructure. This money can be defrayed as
investment, if the return does not exceed 6.5 %.
7) During the beginning period Saddam Hussein and any other prisoners who
are deemed by a Council of Iraqi Judges, elected by the National
representative body, as having committed crimes will be put up for trial.
The trial of Saddam Hussein will be before seven judges, chosen from this
Council of Judges.
One judge, one jury, again chosen by this Council, will try all other
prisoners.
All defendants will have the right to present any evidence they want, and to
choose freely their own lawyers.
Post a Comment
<< Home